Diplomatic malpractice

Published April 23, 2021 3:00am ET



When the news of an explosion at Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility broke in early April, the response from some Democrats was anger. Sen. Chris Murphy tweeted that he was demanding a “security briefing” on the latest events in Iran. He went on to write, “It should go without saying that there is no viable military path to divorcing Iran from a nuclear weapon. Only a diplomatic path. And now, the diplomatic road is more difficult.”

The explosion, which was widely blamed on Israel, occurred soon after the first formal meetings of representatives of the P5+1 nations that had signed on to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, popularly known as the Iran nuclear deal. Under the leadership of veteran diplomat Robert Malley, the talks proceeded with European envoys shuttling between the Americans and the Iranians. The meetings of those diplomats in Vienna represented the first step toward the Biden administration’s stated goal of reviving the pact. They also signaled Joe Biden’s commitment to the process by indicating that the president was prepared to start lifting sanctions imposed on Iran by former President Donald Trump that were “inconsistent” with the 2015 agreement.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.