SORTING OUT SPACE FORCE: Judging by the careful comments of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis as he chatted with reporters on the steps of the Pentagon yesterday, President Trump’s dream of a separate military service to focus on space is still in limbo. Mattis was clear the Pentagon concurs with the urgent need to address space as a “developing warfighting domain,” but hedged on if that will result in a full-fledged Space Force, or whether the Pentagon’s interim step of creating a unified Space Operations Command might fill the bill. “We are in complete alignment with the president’s concern about protecting our assets in space that contribute to our security, to our economy,” Mattis said. “And we’re going to have to address it as other countries show a capability to attack those assets.” A draft Pentagon proposal to create a new combatant command for space, with its own four-star commander was originally scheduled to be released last week, according to Defense One which broke the story. Mattis said he’s fully behind that idea, which can be implemented without the need for new legislation. “A combatant command is certainly one thing that we can establish. This is a process we’re in,” he told reporters. PENCE IS POINTMAN: If Trump is going to be talked down from insisting on a new, sixth branch of the military, Vice President Mike Pence would be the man to do it. “The vice president is kind of the point man for the president on this,” Mattis said. “We are working closely daily with his office and with supporters on Capitol Hill and the relevant committees.” Pence is expected to visit the Pentagon tomorrow to review the planning so far. Mattis indicated there’s been no final decision on whether to ask Congress to fund a fully separate service. “We’re working up what that actual organization will look like … I don’t have all the final answers yet, we’re still putting that together,” Mattis said. “It’ll be fit for purpose is what I can assure you.” CONGRESS LUKEWARM: Lawmakers on Capitol Hill are anxiously awaiting the Pentagon’s space report as they consider the best way to reorganize the military to deal with space. Key senators such as Jim Inhofe, who leads the Armed Services Committee, remain skeptical of Trump’s plan for an entirely new military service. The 2019 National Defense Authorization Act — currently awaiting Trump’s signature — calls for a new sub-unified space command located inside U.S. Strategic Command, a more moderate move than the Pentagon’s draft proposal for a new combatant command, modeled on the recently elevated U.S. Cyber Command. TRUMP SET TO SIGN NDAA: Trump will travel to Fort Drum, N.Y., Monday to sign the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act, according to Rep. Elise Stefanik. “I am honored that President Trump has accepted my invitation to visit Fort Drum and the brave men and women of the 10th Mountain Division on Monday,” Stefanik said in a statement. “As a member of the House Armed Services Committee and the chair of the subcommittee on emerging threats and capabilities, I am honored that the president will sign the historic National Defense Authorization Act in our district at Fort Drum.” She extended the invite to Trump in March. The White House has not yet announced the trip. Good Wednesday morning and welcome to Jamie McIntyre’s Daily on Defense, compiled by Washington Examiner National Security Senior Writer Jamie McIntyre (@jamiejmcintyre) and National Security Writer Travis J. Tritten (@travis_tritten). David Brown is out this week. Email us here for tips, suggestions, calendar items and anything else. If a friend sent this to you and you’d like to sign up, click here. If signing up doesn’t work, shoot us an email and we’ll add you to our list. And be sure to follow us on Twitter @dailyondefense. |
HAPPENING TODAY, ARMS SALES DISCUSSION: Ambassador Tina Kaidanow, who is the acting assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs and oversees foreign weapons sales, will talk about the future of U.S. arms transfer policy at 10:30 a.m. at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. You can catch the webcast here. BITING, JUST NOT THE MOST BITING: When Trump took to Twitter yesterday to tout his reimposition of economic sanctions that were relaxed after the 2015 Iran nuclear deal he called them, “the most biting sanctions ever imposed.” Aside from the obvious fact that he was reinstituting the same sanctions that were in effect before, it’s also the case that this time the U.S. alone is imposing the sanctions, not the other six signatories: Britain, France, Germany, China, Russia, and the EU. On Fox News yesterday, it fell to White House national security adviser John Bolton to admit the obvious, namely the previous sanctions regime had a little more bite. “The sanctions that the United States had imposed over the years against Iran were really very stringent. There were additional sanctions that came in as a result of security council resolutions, those are not coming back into effect,” Bolton told Fox’s Brian Kilmeade. But Bolton argued America, as “the driving force in the world economy,” is imposing sanctions that are hitting Iran where it hurts. “We’ve seen the impact in Iran, the currency’s going through the floor, assets are leaving the country rapidly as people with assets try and get them out before the economy crashes, and average people are in demonstrations all over Iran protesting the deterioration of the economy,” he said. “So we think it’s significant, there will be more to come.” And he downplayed the rift between the Trump administration and the European Union, indicating they had been sold a bill of goods by the previous U.S. administration. “I’ll tell you this, on the way John Kerry and Barack Obama negotiated it, and I’ve heard from some of the Europeans, they did feel cut out. So, I sympathize with them in that regard.” But Bolton said Trump is just doing what is in the best interest of the United States. “We’d like the Europeans to come along with us. We haven’t stopped talking to them and we’re all still in agreement on the fundamental point, which is we don’t [want] Iran with deliverable nuclear weapons.” BOLTON SAYS NORTH KOREA NEEDS TO STEP IT UP: Bolton also said on Fox that North Korea has yet to live up to it deal to dismantle its nuclear program. “We’re still waiting for them to take real steps towards denuclearization,” Bolton said. “The consequences of denuclearization for North Korea are enormous and positive and he just needs to get to performance.” RUBIO’S RIGHT: Bolton also said he agrees with Florida Sen. Marco Rubio that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is trying to play Trump by making a series of unilateral concessions that do not undermine his capabilities in the long term. “For example,” Rubio said in a video clip played on Fox, “I think he’s more than willing to tear apart facilities that are no longer necessary for old missiles, because he’s got newer ones that work better. I believe he has undisclosed sites that he thinks he can shield from the world.” “I agree with everything that Sen. Rubio said, and that’s why I’ve said repeatedly there’s nobody in the Trump administration, starting with the president, who has stars in their eyes about North Korea,” Bolton said. Trump, he said, having seen 25 years of failure in getting North Korea to stop its nuclear weapons program, is “not going to fall for those North Korean tricks.” “He’s made it very clear to Kim Jong Un that if he walks through the door there’s a different life ahead for the people of North Korea, and it’s up to them to do it. NOTHING TO ANNOUNCE: Responding to the reports from the White House that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo might soon return to North Korea next for a second meeting with Kim, the State Department was noncommittal. “I think that would be getting ahead of where we are right now,” said spokeswoman Heather Nauert. “We have no trips, no travel to announce. And by the way, just on Sunday, we got back from a very long — a lot of flying hours to Asia. I think it was 20-some hours. So I think we’re OK with being here right now.” NO OFFENSE INTENDED: When Mattis was chatting up Pentagon reporters yesterday outside the Pentagon, he was awaiting the arrival of his British counterpart Gavin Williamson. It was just two months ago that Mattis sent U.K. defense secretary a strongly-worded letter warning him that even though Great Britain was meeting its 2 percent NATO defense spending goal, global nations like the U.K. needed to do more, requiring “a level of defense spending beyond what we would expect from allies with only regional interests.” “I am concerned that your ability to continue to provide this critical military foundation for diplomatic success is at risk of erosion while together we face a world awash in change,” Mattis wrote, adding pointedly that “It is in the best interest of both our nation’s for the U.K. to remain the U.S. partner of choice.” Asked yesterday why he chose to rebuke America’s closest and most stalwart ally, Mattis insisted it was all just routine “back and forth dialogue.” “This is the normal collaboration, the normal consultation between allies,” Mattis said. “I have letters frequently going between myself and trusted ministers of defense, which is throughout NATO. And this was a letter to the U.K. None of them are form letters. They’re all very specific about what we as democracies are doing, united to protect ourselves.” NO OFFENSE TAKEN: Meanwhile, before his meeting with Mattis, Williamson complemented the United States for it greatly increased its commitment to NATO despite Trump’s constant refrain that the allies are not paying their fair share, and veiled threats to exit the alliance. “What you see is a United States that is incredibly committed to NATO, that has deployed or put more resources into NATO over the last 2-3 years than we’ve seen over the last 20 years, and I say you judge a nation on their actions and that is what the United States has been doing,” Williamson told an audience at the Atlantic Council think tank. “The U.S. has been the most reliable partners for us and many other nations, and I have no doubt that that will continue and that will continue to grow,” Williamson said. “Defense is a brilliant example of a debt of that relationship, so many British service personnel working side by side together making sure that the world is a much more peaceful place and you’re seeing that level of commitment not degraded but actually stepped up over the last few years.” PROTECTION RACKET: Trump continues to refer to NATO as if it’s a security arrangement in which European countries pay the U.S. to protect them from Russia, instead of a mutual defense pact aimed at making the world safer for everyone by promoting global security. Here’s how he described his meeting with the leaders of NATO countries to a crowd of cheering supporters in Pennsylvania last Thursday: “I came I said, ‘Fellas, you’re delinquent, you got to pay. You gotta pay.’ And one of the leaders said, ‘Well, Mr. President, could I ask you a question? If we don’t pay, what are you going to do about it?’ I said, “Do you want protection or not? Do you want protection or not?” CONFRONTING CHINA: Assistant Defense Secretary Randy Schriver made his own think tank appearance yesterday and sent a message to Beijing, saying the Trump administration will “confront and compete” with it throughout the Indo-Pacific region. “We seek a positive, results-oriented military and security relationship with Beijing,” Schriver, who oversees Asian and Pacific security affairs, told an audience at the American Enterprise Institute. “But Chairman Xi Jinping and the [Communist Party of China] need to understand that, while we seek cooperation where our interests align, we will confront and compete where we must.” THE RUNDOWN AP: Russia warns of ‘horrible’ conflict if Georgia joins NATO ProPublica: The Shadow Rulers of the VA Defense News: Trump’s arms sales nominee bogged down by 3D gun debate New York Times: Turks Rally Behind Erdogan as Dispute with U.S. Deepens Defense One: The Future Airman is a Hacker AP: Experts: Iran could answer US sanctions with cyberattacks Task and Purpose: The Recruit Who Shipped To Boot Camp With A Mullet Is Now A Marine Foreign Policy: Somalia Is a Country Without an Army Military Times: Naked British Army captain destroys toilet in harrowing bathroom escape Roll Call: Army Seeks Money Shift as Long-Range Weapons Get Longer Business Insider: Check out these stunning photos of sailors swimming next to their nuclear submarine Defense Tech: Air Force Studying Spider Silk For Stronger Body Armor, Parachutes Navy Times: Navy helicopter crewman killed in North Island accident Washington Post: The Chinese threat that an aircraft carrier can’t stop |
CalendarWEDNESDAY | AUG. 8 10:30 a.m. 1616 Rhode Island Ave. NW. U.S. Arms Transfer Policy and Shaping the Way Ahead with Ambassador Tina Kaidanow, acting assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs. csis.org 5:30 p.m. 800 17th St. NW. 2018 HORIZONS Scholarship Celebration. womenindefense.net FRIDAY | AUG. 10 8 a.m. 300 1st St. SE. Nuclear Deterrence, Missile Defense, and Space: Paths Forward with Gen. Paul Selva, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. mitchellaerospacepower.org TUESDAY | AUG. 14 7 a.m. 5701 Marinelli Rd. Global Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Symposium and Exhibition. ndia.org 6 p.m. 529 14th St. NW. “Austin Tice: Children of Syria” photo exhibit. press.org WEDNESDAY | AUG. 15 11 a.m. 46870 Tate Rd. NDIA Patuxent River Speaker Series. ndia.org
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT: NDIA invites you to attend the Army Science and Technology Symposium and Showcase August twenty first through twenty third at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in DC. Register today at http://www.ndia.org/ArmyScience |
|

