TRUMP’S WAR ON INTELLIGENCE: One thing we know about President Trump is he trusts his gut instincts over complicated data analysis. And one thing we know about intelligence is that it is rarely 100 percent conclusive, even when it’s said to be a “slam dunk,” as former CIA Director George Tenet described the flawed intelligence on Saddam Hussein’s WMD in 2002. There’s a well-known maxim that guides the U.S. intelligence community, which aspires to be apolitical as it provides advice to political leaders: “Tell me what you know. Tell me what you think. And make damn clear which is which.” Facts are facts, what we know. But intelligence assessments are what we think, best-guess forecasts of what the known facts suggest. So, when DNI Director Dan Coats says, “Iran maintains the largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the Middle East,” and that Iran is “not currently undertaking activities to produce a nuclear device,” those are facts. But when Coats told the Senate Tuesday, “We currently assess that North Korea will seek to retain its WMD capabilities … because its leaders ultimately view nuclear weapons as critical to regime survival,” that’s an opinion, albeit a very informed opinion bolstered, Coats said, “By our observations of some activity that is inconsistent with full denuclearization.” BACK TO SCHOOL: Trump has a natural distrust of intelligence assessments, especially if they conflict with his firm beliefs or would block his policy objectives. Intelligence assessments are by nature ambiguous — in 2011 briefers told President Obama it was only about 60 percent likely Osama bin Laden was in an Abbottabad, Pakistan compound when the commander-in-chief ordered the raid the killed the 9/11 mastermind. Intelligence assessments can be easily politicized — not by the intelligence agencies by but the policy-makers. If the president wants to act, he can declare the intelligence compelling and conclusive. If the president does not want to act, he can declare the same intelligence inconclusive and unconvincing. Yesterday, Trump unleashed his frustration with his top intelligence advisers in a pair of tweets rejecting their assessments. “The Intelligence people seem to be extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran. They are wrong! When I became President Iran was making trouble all over the Middle East, and beyond. Since ending the terrible Iran Nuclear Deal, they are MUCH different,” Trump tweeted. “But a source of potential danger and conflict. They are testing Rockets (last week) and more, and are coming very close to the edge. There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!” BLOWBACK: Trump’s unprecedented public rebuke of his own appointed intelligence chiefs drew howls of protest from many quarters. “He wrote the intelligence people seem to be passive and naive. This is from a president who said he is in love with Kim Jong Un, one of the world’s most vicious dictators, and who has taken the word of Vladimir Putin that he did not hack the Democratic party in 2016. So, this is the president accusing the intelligence community of being passive and naive. That’s a joke,” said commentator and consistent Trump critic Max Boot, previously a conservative voice, on CNN. “The president is living in this alternative universe, where he believes he wants to believe and he doesn’t care about the facts.” Former Pentagon spokesman retired Rear Adm. John Kirby, who is now a CNN contributor, said, “This is the whole essence of the Trump foreign policy, so much that there actually is a foreign policy, it’s all about him and his outsized ego and personality.” “That’s really dangerous for us when you have a president who … seems to be willfully ignorant and not willing to absorb the context of those professionals and factor that and them and their agencies into his national security decision-making process. That’s not good for us at all,” said Kirby, who was State Department spokesman under President Obama. MAYBE IT’S TIME TO STFU: “The Intelligence Committee should give Trump officials their reservations about policy on ISIS, North Korea, Iran, etc., but when Intelligence agencies do so publicly, they are undermining the administration and are pushing their own policies,” argues Fred Fleitz of the Center for Security Policy. “IC officials said yesterday that North Korea remains ‘unlikely to give up’ its nuclear weapon stockpiles. All observers knew this. But such a public finding could affect NK’s position at nuclear talks and undermine U.S. efforts to convince NK to give up its nukes,” said Fleitz, who until recently was national security adviser John Bolton’s chief of staff, and deputy assistant to the president. ‘SEEK AND SPEAK THE TRUTH’: In his testimony this week before the Senate Select Committee on intelligence, Coats explained his guiding principle as the nation’s top spymaster is “to seek the truth and speak the truth.” “Our mission is to keep our heads down, our focus on the mission that we have to achieve in order to keep American people safe and our policymakers aware of what’s happening.” Good Thursday morning and welcome to Jamie McIntyre’s Daily on Defense, written and compiled by Washington Examiner National Security Senior Writer Jamie McIntyre (@jamiejmcintyre) and edited by David Mark (@DavidMarkDC). Email us here for tips, suggestions, calendar items and anything else. If a friend sent this to you and you’d like to sign up, click here. If signing up doesn’t work, shoot us an email and we’ll add you to our list. And be sure to follow us on Twitter @dailyondefense. |
HAPPENING TODAY— MORE 4Q EARNINGS: The fourth quarter of 2019 is turning out to be a mixed one for the nation’s major defense contractors, who should be benefiting from the full-funding of the Pentagon, as well as stronger global demand for fighter jets and munitions. So far Lockheed Martin, Boeing and General Dynamics have reported fourth-quarter results, and two more major weapons-makers are reporting results today, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon. GD EARNINGS DISAPPOINT: General Dynamics Corp on forecast 2019 profits lower than analysts estimated and said margins in its critical business jet unit would not improve substantially until 2020, sending shares down nearly 4 percent, per Reuters. BOEING GOING GANGBUSTERS: On the other hand Boeing Co. saw its stock price jump 6 percent after it raised its profit and cash flow expectations for 2019. The Chicago-based plane-maker won lucrative new contracts for a Navy drone and an Air Force training jet in 2018, which pushed its sales figures to a new high. Revenue grew 8 percent to $101.1 billion, Boeing said yesterday, driven by a lucrative fourth quarter that included higher fighter-jet sales in its military unit and increased deliveries of commercial planes, such as the composite-plastic 787 Dreamliner. Earnings of $16.01 a share topped the $15.11 average estimate from analysts surveyed by FactSet. $2 BILLION AEGIS DEAL TO JAPAN: The State Department has approved the potential sale to Japan of two Lockheed Martin Aegis Weapon Systems, along with related equipment in a deal that is estimated to be worth $2.15 billion. General Dynamics Corp will get the work for “command and control processor refresh.” The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of the possible sale Tuesday. DEMS PUSH FOR ‘NO USE FIRST’ OF NUKES: House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. has teamed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee to introduce legislation in both chambers of Congress to restrict bar U.S. from initiating the use of nuclear weapons. The U.S. has never adopted a “no use first” policy for nuclear weapons, but Smith and Warren argue “our current nuclear strategy is not just outdated — it is dangerous.” Still, it’s unlikely that the legislation if it were to pass, would ever be signed by President Trump, who would be ceding what has been a presidential prerogative since the dawn of the nuclear age. Trump’s 2018 Nuclear Posture Review states a “no first use” policy for nuclear weapons would limit the U.S. ability to preserve strategic ambiguity about when and how the U.S. might employ nuclear weapons. NO WALL, NO DEAL: President Trump says lawmakers are “wasting their time” if the border security talks that began yesterday don’t include funding for a physical barrier at the southern border. “If the committee of Republicans and Democrats now meeting on Border Security is not discussing or contemplating a Wall or Physical Barrier, they are Wasting their time!” Trump tweeted yesterday morning. House Democrats drafted an opening bid that leaves out funding for a wall or barrier along the southern border. “If you are asking if there is any money for a border wall, there is not,” Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., a top appropriator and member of the panel, said. Roybal-Allard is among a bipartisan group of 17 House and Senate lawmakers who met for the first time yesterday in an effort to strike a deal on border security and federal funding by a Feb. 15 deadline. The leader of the group, House Appropriations Chair Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., said she is not ruling out wall funding as the negotiations proceed. But she suggested Democrats will stick to their currently-held view that a border wall is unnecessary and that other enhancements, such as technology, would be more effective. In an appearance Tuesday night on Fox, the president’s son Eric Trump told Sean Hannity, his father would likely declare an emergency if he doesn’t get sufficient money for wall or border barriers. “I want him to declare an emergency,” he said. Speaking on CNN, Sen. Chris Coons D-Del., repeated the Democrats’ mantra that there is no crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, citing the fact the subject never came up when all the top intelligence and law enforcement official testified Tuesday Senate hearing on worldwide threats “Notice they did not testify that the southern border and the absence of a wall there is a great security threat to our country,” Coons told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. STRIKES SHOW ISIS STILL PUTTING UP A FIGHT: Sometimes it pays to look at the details of the routine strike releases put out by the U.S.-led coalition still fighting what’s left of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. For the two-week period between Jan. 13-26 the coalition conducted 645 strikes against 1,360 targets in Syria, using “fighter, attack, bomber, rotary-wing, or remotely piloted aircraft, rocket-propelled artillery and ground-based tactical artillery.” The numbers show that even as the Pentagon predicts victory by the end of February, the fighting is fierce: “In Syria, 645 strikes engaged 394 ISIS tactical units, and destroyed 244 fighting positions, 172 supply routes, 85 staging areas, 21 vehicles, 17 buildings, 15 vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices, 14 mortar launching sites, 13 manufacturing facilities for improvised explosive devices, 12 command and control nodes, nine tunnels, eight weapons catches, seven pieces of engineering equipment, five launching sites for unmanned aircraft systems, two weapons storage facilities, two mortar tubes, two improvised explosive devices, one unmanned aircraft system, one machine gun, one logistic node and one checkpoint.” Repeating for emphasis, over two weeks 394 ISIS tactical units 244 “fighting positions” were attacked by mostly U.S. assets. PAY RAISE FOR DoD CIVILIANS: When Congress passed the Pentagon’s budget for the current fiscal year, it included a 2.6 percent pay increase for the uniformed military. But the more than 700,000 civilians who work side-by-side were left out, and President Trump wanted to freeze their salaries and give them no pay raise for 2019. That was before the 35-day shutdown, after which Trump heaped praise on the federal workforce, including those DoD civilians. “I want to thank all of the incredible federal workers, and their amazing families, who have shown such extraordinary devotion in the face of this recent hardship,” Trump said last week when he announced he was temporality ending the partial government shutdown. “You are fantastic people. You are incredible patriots. Many of you have suffered far greater than anyone, but your families would know or understand.” Yesterday, with the help of 29 Republicans, the House voted to give federal workers the same 2.6 percent raise. That came over the objections of most Republicans, who said federal employees are already paid more on average than their private-sector counterparts. Every Democrat voted for the bill, which passed the House 259-161. THE PROBLEM WITH PARTNERS: The Center for Strategic and International Studies is out with a new analysis of the pros and cons of working “by, with, and through” partner forces in counterterrorism missions, titled: “Imperfect Proxies: The Pros and Perils of Partnering with Non-State Actors for CT.” From the report: Pro: Will to Fight: Lacking the resources and capabilities of a national army, non-state actors may have a strong incentive to partner with foreign powers when terrorist groups pose a military or even existential threat to the militia and its people. Con: But Not Just for You: Militia may perceive terrorist groups as one among several enemies amid a multi-faceted civil conflict and shift their attention and arms toward other foes when the terrorist threat ebbs, losing the incentive to press the CT fight to the finish. Non-state actors may also view Western-backed CT campaigns as a means to expand their own spheres of influence at the expense of local rivals and adversaries. MEA CULPA: Yesterday, I unintentionally broke an embargo on the latest SIGAR report on Afghanistan. It was supposed to be held for release for this morning. After hearing the report cited on BBC in the predawn hours, I misread the embargo time and mistook midnight last night for the night before. My apologies to both the office of Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction and my colleagues in the press for the inadvertent scoop. “To err is human, to forgive divine,” but unfortunately neither is the policy of my editor David Mark. THE RUNDOWN Breaking Defense: HASC Dems Press To Resume Korea Wargames; Trump Tweets Vs. Intel Community Bloomberg: Stagnant F-35 Reliability Means Fewer Available Jets: Pentagon The Hill: Bipartisan House group introduces bills to stall Syria, South Korea troop withdrawals Wall Street Journal: Islamic State Enlists Women as Covert Operatives in Survival Bid Military Times: Iraq, Afghanistan vets are split on whether wars were ‘worth it’ New York Times: Kremlin Sees Venezuela As Different From Syria Military.com: As Russia, China Threaten, Navy SEALs Get a New Focus Military.com: Family of Fallen Navy Linguist Fights Regulation That Forced Her Deployment Stars and Stripes: VA unveils proposed new rules to expand private-sector care The National Interest: What the Coast Guard Crisis Should Teach Congress USNI News: Navy to Honor First Female Fighter Pilot with Female-Piloted Flyover at Funeral |
CalendarTHURSDAY | JANUARY 31 9 a.m. 1030 15th Street N.W. “The Belarus Dilemma: For Minsk and the West.” www.atlanticcouncil.org 11:45 a.m. 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 400. “Post-ISIS Iraq: Collective Punishment of the Sunni People.” www.hudson.org 1:30 p.m. 1616 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W. “Masterpiece or Misfire? What to Expect in the FY 2020 Defense Budget Request.” www.csis.org FRIDAY | FEBRUARY 1 1 p.m. 1616 Rhode Island Avenue, N.W. “The 2019 Missile Defense Review: What’s Next?” www.csis.org TUESDAY | FEBRUARY 5 10 a.m. Dirksen 226. Senate Judiciary Committee Nominations Hearing. www.judiciary.senate.gov 10 a.m. 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. “Book Launch: On the Brink: Trump, Kim, and the Threat of Nuclear War.” www.wilsoncenter.org 10 a.m. 30th Annual SO/LIC Symposium & Exhibition. Hyatt Regency Crystal City at Reagan National Airport. http://www.ndia.org 12 p.m. 1800 M Street N.W., Suite 800. By invitation only — “Preparing for a cyber-enabled economic warfare attack.” www.fdd.org 2:30 p.m. 1779 Massachusetts Avenue N.W. “Rep. Eliot Engel on the Foreign Policy Priorities of the New Democratic Majority.” carnegieendowment.org WEDNESDAY | FEBRUARY 6 7 a.m. 30th Annual SO/LIC Symposium & Exhibition. Hyatt Regency Crystal City at Reagan National Airport. http://www.ndia.org 9 a.m. 1030 15th Street N.W. “Maintaining Maritime Superiority: Discussion With the Chief of Naval Operations.” www.atlanticcouncil.org 9:45 a.m. 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 400. “The 2019 U.S. Missile Defense Review: A Conversation with Under Secretary John C. Rood.” www.hudson.org 10 a.m. 1789 Massachusetts Avenue N.W. “A conversation with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on the Senate’s role in foreign policy.” www.aei.org 10 a.m. Rayburn 2118. House Armed Services Committee hearing: Evaluation of the Department of Defense’s Counterterrorism Approach. armedservices.house.gov 10 a.m. Dirksen 342. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Business Meeting. www.hsgac.senate.gov 10:15 a.m. Hart 216. Senate Armed Services Committee: Worldwide Threats. www.armed-services.senate.gov 4:30 p.m. 1717 Massachusetts Avenue N.W. “Peace-Building on the Korean Peninsula: Does Multilateralism Matter?” www.sais-jhu.edu THURSDAY | FEBRUARY 7 8 a.m. 30th Annual SO/LIC Symposium & Exhibition. Hyatt Regency Crystal City at Reagan National Airport. http://www.ndia.org 11:30 a.m. 1667 K Street, NW. “Regaining the High Ground at Sea: Transforming the U.S. Navy’s Carrier Air Wing for Great Power Competition” https://csbaonline.org |
|