EXography: Hope and change? Congressional re-election rates bolster status quo

John D. Dingell

60 years | D-MI

John Conyers Jr.

50 years | D-MI

Thad Cochran

48 years | R-MS

Edward J. Markey

46 years | D-MA

Charles B. Rangel

44 years | D-NY

Chuck Grassley

42 years | R-IA

Don Young

42 years | R-AK

Orrin G. Hatch

42 years | R-UT

Patrick J. Leahy

42 years | D-VT

Tom Harkin

40 years | D-IA

Ron Wyden

40 years | D-OR

George Miller

40 years | D-CA

Henry A. Waxman

40 years | D-CA

Barbara A. Mikulski

40 years | D-MD

Nick J. Rahall II

38 years | D-WV

Charles E. Schumer

36 years | D-NY

Thomas E. Petri

36 years | R-WI

F. James Sensenbrenner Jr.

36 years | R-WI

Carl Levin

36 years | D-MI

Frank R. Wolf

34 years | R-VA

John McCain

34 years | R-AZ

Harold Rogers

34 years | R-KY

Harry Reid

34 years | D-NV

Barbara Boxer

34 years | D-CA

Christopher H. Smith

34 years | R-NJ

Steny H. Hoyer

34 years | D-MD

Pat Roberts

34 years | R-KS

Richard J. Durbin

32 years | D-IL

Robert Menendez

32 years | D-NJ

Benjamin L. Cardin

32 years | D-MD

Marcy Kaptur

32 years | D-OH

James M. Inhofe

32 years | R-OK

Sander M. Levin

32 years | D-MI

Joe Barton

30 years | R-TX

Howard Coble

30 years | R-NC

Dianne Feinstein

30 years | D-CA

Bill Nelson

30 years | D-FL

Peter J. Visclosky

30 years | D-IN

Mitch McConnell

30 years | R-KY

John D. Rockefeller, IV

30 years | D-WV

Tim Johnson

28 years | D-SD

Peter A. DeFazio

28 years | D-OR

Fred Upton

28 years | R-MI

John Lewis

28 years | D-GA

Thomas R. Carper

28 years | D-DE

Bernard Sanders

28 years | I-VT

John J. Duncan Jr.

28 years | R-TN

Lamar Smith

28 years | R-TX

Frank Pallone Jr.

28 years | D-NJ

Louise McIntosh Slaughter

28 years | D-NY

Nancy Pelosi

28 years | D-CA

Daniel Coats

26 years | R-IN

David E. Price

26 years | D-NC

Richard E. Neal

26 years | D-MA

José E. Serrano

26 years | D-NY

Roger F. Wicker

26 years | R-MS

Dana Rohrabacher

26 years | R-CA

Sherrod Brown

26 years | D-OH

Eni F. H. Faleomavaega

26 years | D-AS

Eliot L. Engel

26 years | D-NY

Nita M. Lowey

26 years | D-NY

Jim McDermott

26 years | D-WA

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen

26 years | R-FL

James P. Moran

24 years | D-VA

Democratic Congressmen John Dingell, John Conyers and Charlie Rangel have all served in the House of Representatives for well over 40 consecutive years. It’s not exactly the change President Obama promised in 2008.

Fifty-two Democrats and 26 Republicans have served more than 10 terms in Congress, a Washington Examiner analysis of legislative data shows. The rate with which politicians from both parties are turning Congress into a career has risen dramatically over time.

Even as America’s population has grown, its society has become more inclusive, and technology has lowered the barrier to entry to join the political discourse, Americans are narrowing their sights to an ever-smaller cadre of politicians to represent them in Congress.

Rise of the Career Lawmaker

Some senators, including Harry Reid, rarely go home; other senators do it constantly

Senators’ trips home decline with time in office, age, boosting claims of term limits advocates

Americans revile Congress — but keep re-electing incumbents over and over


Potential candidates are no longer limited to white, male landowners who can afford to print and deliver pamphlets, as they were in the republic’s earliest years.

Yet for decade after decade, many congressional districts return the same person to Congress, and for many presidents and congressmen, voters return to the same families.

Of the hundreds of millions of Americans born since the founding of the nation, only 12,000 have ever served in Congress.

Dingell was born in 1926 and has been elected to two-year terms in the House since 1955, when he succeeded his father. He is retiring this year, and voters may elect his wife to replace him.

Conyers, the second-longest serving member, was also born in 1926 and has served in the House since 1965.

To earn that sort of job security, one might assume that these members have incredible records of legislative excellence.

Instead, both represent Detroit-area districts. In the six decades coinciding with Dingell’s tenure, Detroit’s median wage plummeted from among the highest in the nation to close to the worst, according to the Detroit News.

Dingell and Conyers weren’t solely responsible for Detroit’s woes, but politicians are never bashful about taking credit for good news, either.

Tim LaPira, a political scientist at James Madison University, said congressional incumbents often get credit for doling out government resources.

“If I’m a grandma and I need a Social Security check, I can’t call the challenger,” LaPira said.

Incumbents are rarely challenged in primaries, so when change does come, it is often because lawmakers retire or their districts undergo a rare generational shift in voting patterns.

Democrats held the lead in the number of veteran members even before long-serving Republicans began facing Tea Party primary challengers.

Many districts appear to be filled with voters who are stubborn in their determination to elect Democrats but decidedly complacent when it comes to looking outside of the current occupant for a candidate.

In the Illinois state House of Representatives, for example, not only does the Democratic Party have an iron grip, but the same man has controlled the chamber as speaker for 30 years.

Eleven of the 15 longest-serving lawmakers are Democrats, but Republicans have also chronically elected their own, including Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran, who doesn’t actually live in his home state, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch, and Alaska Rep. Don Young, who last month was recorded strong-arming a staffer.

Rangel has represented his New York district for 44 years despite ethics problems including questions about his taxes. Those problems didn’t prevent Rangel from becoming chairman of the powerful, tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee.

In Congress, low turnover becomes especially problematic because with seniority come the committee chairmanships that shape U.S. policy, meaning the nation’s most critical decisions come down to choices made by the least particular voters.

Republicans have set term limits on leadership positions and committee chairmanships, but senior members can simply hop from one committee to another. Democrats have set no term limits on internal congressional posts.

David Corbin, a political scientist at King’s College in New York, said many Democratic voters, including those who are members of public employee unions, tend to be more closely wedded to the status quo — even as they talk of change.

And the incumbent is essentially the face of the status quo.

“You have a tremendously integrated network of public service employees … every organization that’s on the receiving end of government largess. The Democrats’ get-out-the-vote effort has a much more organized network of multipliers,” Corbin said.

“The one thing those people do is pay off their political supporters in hard currency,” Corbin argued, rather than winning them over with less-tangible arguments.

Power is a zero-sum game, and when people are dependent on government, that cedes power to incumbent lawmakers, Corbin said, regardless of their personal missteps or lack of legislative accomplishments.

And lawmakers are happy to accept that. The “change” and inclusion is apparently something to be bestowed upon the masses by “a very small cohort … of paternalistic elites,” Corbin said.

Former District of Columbia Mayor Marion Barry, for example, disgraced himself by smoking crack on camera. But he was re-elected after being released from prison, in part by playing the victim.

Longtime politicos often weather controversy by blaming the powers that be, Corbin said.

“In a case like Marion Barry or Conyers or Dingell, they’re just going to try to say ‘The man is trying to take me down.’ Their transgressions don’t count against them because they’re counted as something someone else has done to them.”

But eventually a contradiction emerges: After being in office for so long at the highest levels of government, the Rangels, Barrys and Dingells are themselves “the man.”

Related Content