‘The Silent Artillery of Time’

In a short, powerful piece in National Review, Rick Brookhiser concludes that “the conservative movement is no more. Its destroyers are Donald Trump and his admirers.”

Looking around me in early 2018, I can’t disagree. This is cause for lament, and lament Brookhiser does, as I do. But in the midst of your sorrows, you of course realize: Movements grow old. They eventually die. Bill Buckley founded the American conservative movement in 1955. Can a political movement reasonably be expected to thrive and retain its vigor for more than 60 years, for more than three generations?

I’m reminded of Abraham Lincoln’s great speech on “The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions,” delivered when he was 28 years old in 1838—slightly more than six decades after the American Revolution. Lincoln lamented the fact that the memories of the revolution were fading, and with them the attachment to its principles. The whole speech is worth reading for its power and subtlety, but here’s a key section:

“I do not mean to say, that the scenes of the revolution are now or ever will be entirely forgotten; but that like every thing else, they must fade upon the memory of the world, and grow more and more dim by the lapse of time. In history, we hope, they will be read of, and recounted, so long as the bible shall be read;— but even granting that they will, their influence cannot be what it heretofore has been. Even then, they cannot be so universally known, nor so vividly felt, as they were by the generation just gone to rest. At the close of that struggle, nearly every adult male had been a participator in some of its scenes. The consequence was, that of those scenes, in the form of a husband, a father, a son or brother, a living history was to be found in every family— a history bearing the indubitable testimonies of its own authenticity, in the limbs mangled, in the scars of wounds received, in the midst of the very scenes related—a history, too, that could be read and understood alike by all, the wise and the ignorant, the learned and the unlearned.—But those histories are gone. They can be read no more forever. They were a fortress of strength; but, what invading foeman could never do, the silent artillery of time has done; the leveling of its walls. They are gone.—They were a forest of giant oaks; but the all-resistless hurricane has swept over them, and left only, here and there, a lonely trunk, despoiled of its verdure, shorn of its foliage; unshading and unshaded, to murmur in a few gentle breezes, and to combat with its mutilated limbs, a few more ruder storms, then to sink, and be no more. They were the pillars of the temple of liberty; and now, that they have crumbled away, that temple must fall, unless we, their descendants, supply their places with other pillars, hewn from the solid quarry of sober reason….”

Trump is the proximate, the efficient, cause of the collapse of the conservative movement. The principles of sound conservativism compel us to criticize him, to rebut him, to resist him, and to plan to overcome him. But, perhaps it is the “silent artillery of time” that has done the damage which Trump was able to take advantage of. And that suggests our task, the task of the descendants of the founders of American conservatism goes beyond that: It is to rebuild, or to build other pillars that will uphold the temple of American liberty in the 21st century.

Brookhiser suggests at the end of his piece, “It will take a lot of arguing to rebuild a conservative movement that one can contemplate without scorn.” True. And it will take a lot of work to create a new birth of conservatism—if it even is still called conservatism—that will support American freedom and greatness.

Related Content