Carter a ‘rare leader’ who understands Pentagon policy and budget

Ashton Carter, reportedly President Obama’s choice to be the next defense secretary, is no stranger to the Pentagon bureaucracy, having spent much of the past six years trying to tame it.

Carter, 60, a physicist with a bachelor’s degree in medieval history from Yale, was the Pentagon’s top weapons buyer under former Defense Secretary Robert Gates and deputy to former Secretary Leon Panetta. He had earlier served in the Pentagon during the Clinton administration as assistant secretary of defense for international security policy and was an adviser to Goldman Sachs on global affairs.

He left the Pentagon in December 2013 after having been passed over in favor of current Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, who is being forced out by Obama, and returned to his post as a professor at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

As undersecretary for acquisitions, technology and logistics, Carter began an overhaul of the Pentagon’s acquisition process, which included a restructuring of the $400 billion F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, the largest in U.S. history, and cancellation of billions of dollars in other programs. He also oversaw logistics for the 2010 surge of troops into Afghanistan.

While serving as deputy secretary, Carter led the review of U.S. military strategy that led to the well-known “pivot” to Asia and the Pacific and a new emphasis on cyber warfare.

He had a reputation for being blunt, telling reporters in a January 2012 briefing about choices in the wake of drastic Pentagon budget cuts that cancellation is “the fate of things that become too expensive in a resource-constrained environment.”

After an April 2013 speech, Carter responded to a reporter’s question on Chinese concerns about the pivot to Asia, specifically U.S. actions in Korea by saying “if the Chinese find things they don’t like to see there’s an easy way to address that, which is talk to the North Koreans about stopping these provocations.”

Carter “was the rare leader who understood both the policy and budget sides of the agency,” and would often slip out on weekends to visit wounded soldiers at local military hospitals, Panetta wrote in his memoir, Worthy Fights.

“Ash had been a protege of former Secretary Bill Perry, whom I always admired, and Ash had made strong gains over the past two years — helping Bob Gates rapidly field mine-resistant vehicles in Afghanistan and smashing some old bureaucratic totems,” Panetta wrote.

Carter is expected to have a fairly easy time being confirmed by the Senate, having been confirmed unanimously to his two previous posts.

“I can’t imagine that he’s going to have opposition to his confirmation,” said Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

In his valedictory speech at the Pentagon a year ago, Carter shared his hopes for the future, which are likely to serve as a blueprint for how he would approach challenges such as the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, a newly assertive Russia and the drawdown in Afghanistan:

“I hope, first, that we’re given the chance to win in Afghanistan, because winning is truly within our grasp, so that we secure an Afghanistan that will not again be a source of attack on our country and that gives a decent life to its people and so that America retains its reputation as a country that defeats its foes and keeps its commitments to its friends.

“More broadly, I hope we continue to learn ever better ways to combat terrorism, because as long as there is human society, there will be the problem of the few against the many, the abhorrent and twisted against the decent and tolerant civilized life. And so those charged with security, including the Department of Defense, will always retain this mission. To do it in a democracy, we will need to convince the public that the methods we are using are necessary, lawful and appropriate, as they have been in every — on every occasion I’ve witnessed during this administration.

“But with all this, and more fundamentally, the post-9/11 era is ending, and I hope that we continue to turn a strategic corner, to leave behind the era of Iraq and Afghanistan and Osama bin Laden and face this department towards the challenges and opportunities that will define the future for you, our successors as soldiers and citizens.

“I hope, for example, to see us continue the so-called rebalance to the Asia-Pacific, where so much of humanity’s future will be written, and where peace and prosperity will depend in the future as it has for decades, on the pivotal, stabilizing role of U.S. military power.

“I hope to see us invest in new capabilities for you in cyber, special operations forces, space, [intelligence, surveillance and reconaissance], counter-weapons of mass destruction, electronic warfare, and dramatically new things that we don’t talk about that will surprise the world, all so that you have the most technologically advanced systems, and in medical advances, like brain injury, so that your wounded comrades live long and full lives.

“And I hope to see us enhance the number and capabilities of the alliances and partnerships that the U.S. only, because of its — the values it represents has, our challengers and antagonists have none, whether in the Middle East, Asia, Africa, Europe, South America, and add new ones, like India, so that you don’t have to bear the world’s security burden alone.”

Related Content