The future of 241 terror suspects at the Guantanamo Bay military prison dominated a Capitol Hill war spending debate Thursday, as Republicans warned that the Obama administration was preparing to release dangerous killers into American neighborhoods and Democrats accused the GOP of fear-mongering.
Ultimately, Republican attempts to prevent the Guantanamo facility from being closed were defeated along party lines by the House Appropriations Committee. However, the panel refused to give President Barack Obama the $50 million he had requested to relocate Guantanamo prisoners and it demanded a detailed plan from the White House by Oct. 1 on the future of the facility.
Recommended Stories
The Guantanamo provision is part of a $96.7 billion measure the committee approved to pay for military and diplomatic efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan through the fall. The package is nearly $12 billion more than Obama sought.
The spending bill would push the costs of the two wars to almost $1 trillion since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, according to the Congressional Research Service.
Republicans had previously seized on Obama’s pledge to close Guantanamo as a way to criticize him for being weak on serious national security issues. At Thursday’s session, Rep. Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan., said voting against the Republican plan would endanger U.S. citizens.
“They’re not repentant sinners,” Tiahrt said of the detainees. “I don’t want them in my hometown.”
Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Texas, said Tiahrt and the Republicans were playing politics. The Guantanamo prison has become a “recruiting tool” for al Qaeda and other terrorists groups, Edwards said, and needs to be shuttered.
The committee also turned aside an amendment from Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Ky., to shift $200 million out of foreign operation accounts to the Department of Homeland Security and other U.S. agencies fighting the drug war along the U.S.-Mexico border.
“There is an absolute crying need for us to give money to these agencies,” Rogers said.
Democrats said these agencies have enough money to do the job.
The committee also approved a compromise plan to shift to the State Department control of hundreds of millions dollars in security and counterinsurgency aid for troubled Pakistan.
They rejected Republicans’ bid to keep the fund in the Pentagon’s hands.
Under the compromise, the Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund would remain with the Pentagon until September 2010. After that, the $400 million account would be transferred to the State Department.
Republicans on the committee objected, saying Obama and senior U.S. military leaders wanted the Pakistan counterinsurgency fund to remain in the defense budget.
But Democrats argued that in Pakistan, where there is not a significant U.S. military presence, the State Department should be the agency with greater authority.
While the committee backed the Obama administration’s plans to send more troops and equipment to Afghanistan, it also made clear speedy results are expected.
