College campus protests have spread across the country. At least 65 campuses have had student-led organizations demanding greater social justice to protect them from their fears, delusions, and pre-conceived notions of how the world works.
While there were some universal demands from all the student groups — increased funding for black organizations, the renaming of buildings, and increasing minority staff and student populations — others had demands ranging from ridiculous to dangerous.
At the University of Missouri, the ground zero of campus protests, activist students want to create and “enforce comprehensive racial awareness and inclusion curriculum throughout all campus departments and units, mandatory for all students, faculty, staff and administration.”
This curriculum to alter the way other students feel about race will be “vetted, maintained, and overseen” by students, staff, and faculty of color. Basically radical minority activists will control the education of everyone in the college.
At Cal Poly activists also demanded a change to the curriculum but want to focus on the feature of “feminism and anti-racism perspectives” in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math. What would engineering be without the endless contributions of third wave feminists?
They also wanted to establish a “Women’s, Gender, & Queer Studies major” for students desire to be chronically unemployed in the future.
Bard College activists said not mandating courses in social justice was an “act of deliberate negligence,” because real adults are more socially aware than college students. That statement was obviously written by people who have not experienced life outside a university.
Social Justice Warriors at Michigan State University were less concerned about changing the curriculum than about adding new classes — important classes that everyone would benefit from including: Black Politics, Black Linguistics, Black Sociology, Black Psychology, African politics, Black Queer Studies, Hip-Hop Studies, African American Literature, African Literature, and Decolonial Theory.
The students at Michigan State also demanded that the only people who could teach these courses are the ones approved by “a panel of black student leaders.”
Amherst College activists were less focused on reprogramming students by changing the curriculum and wanted more “safe spaces.”
“College Police Department must issue a statement of protection and defense from any form of violence, threats, or retaliation of any kind resulting from this movement.” They also wanted the school president to issue a revision of the Honor Code “to reflect a zero-tolerance policy for racial insensitivity and hate speech.”
They did not state if that includes hoaxes created by fellow activists, as was the case at Kean University.
Social Justice Warriors (SJWs) at Dartmouth and Beloit want to take resources away from minority students to “create more opportunities, or make opportunities more accessible, for undocumented students.” Dartmouth went so far as demanding that illegal alien students’ applications in the “domestic/U.S.A. applicant pool, not the international admissions pool,” so they can compete for spots with American citizens — including other minorities.
Dartmouth also wanted to declare itself a “safe space from the words “illegal aliens,” “illegal immigrants,” “wetback,” from the school-sanctioned programming materials and locations.
Dartmouth also wanted 47 percent of post-doctoral students to be people of color.
The activists were especially insane for their spelling of “womyn,” adding a y instead of an e to really give a middle finger to the patriarchy.
Defending the rights of “womyn” meant all women, including those with a penis. They demanded that “all male-female checkboxes should be replaced with write-in boxes to make forms, surveys and applications more inclusive for trans*, two-spirit, agender, gender-nonconforming and genderqueer folks. This should be a campus-wide policy.”
Boston College had one of the most radical agendas: a 3 Point Guide to eradicate racism on the campus, required diversity and anti-oppression training for the BC community, and reforming the “pedagogy and curriculum to reduce eurocentric focus and address racism and diversity in the classroom.”
Nearly every campus demanded that they increase the minority population, but some schools including Notre Dame of Maryland University, Brown University, and Occidental College wanted to increase the number by 100 percent.
Brown University students also wanted an annual public report to assess all racist hiring, retention policies, and anti-Black pedagogy. They also wanted to designate an annual day of remembrance for the slave trade.
Nortre Dame of Maryland students wanted a demilitarization of school security including removing of “bulletproof vests from uniform” and “exclusion of military and external police rhetoric from all documents and daily discourse.”
Brandies University also demanded a 15 percent increase in an admittance of black students via the general admission process for both undergraduate and graduate schools.
No better way of telling black students that they’re equal then promoting them solely based on their skin color.
Some students are demanding that white students feel the oppression that minority students feel. Activists at Claremont McKenna said that they want to expose white students to systemic oppression to the “numerous microaggressions felt by students of color” through workshops, classes, and sensitivity training.
They site a frat party called “Colonial Bros and Navajo Hoes” as one of those trigger warnings, they were probably triggered because they weren’t invited.
Duke University also took aim at frats for wearing “culturally insensitive costumes” or throwing “culturally insensitive parties.” The Duke activists want to be able to any student wearing such a costume “for bias/harassment infractions.”
The activists at Duke took censorship and to a whole new level; they want to censor any speech “that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, gender expression, disability, or other traits.”
Duke’s SJWs also want free education from any student whose families make less than $75,000 annually and the ability for a student to omit SAT/ACT scores on their application — because that’s probably racist.
At Purdue University, President Mitch Daniels has actively said that his school is a “freedom of speech zone,” and SJWs aren’t happy about it. They want an apology for his email declaring all forms of speech as tolerable and a revision of the school’s free speech policy so that it address hate speech and protects students from “hostility.”
The war against words was a serious demand for SJWs at Emory University and Missouri State University. At Emory, students demanded “repercussions or sanctions for racist actions performed by professors, administrators/staff and students alike. Bias incident reports are not sufficient. Our micro and macro-aggressions should not be regarded as just data collection but should, in fact, be taken seriously and met with the highest level of urgency and care.”
So if white kids at a frat got drunk while wearing a sombrero, it should be met with the same seriousness as a stabbing or rape?
SJWs at MSU wanted school officials to acknowledge the “systemic racism in higher education” and differentiate “hate speech” from “freedom of speech.”
Grinnell College‘s SJWs want “time devoted in every tutorial class to discussing –isms in contemporary society.” The probably doesn’t include the shortcomings of Bernie Sander’s democratic socialism.
They also demand that American professors start educating international students of color about the history of U.S. racism. Welcome to America, let me tell you why you’re already oppressed.
New York University‘s SJWs had a similar demand, but they wanted their school to “reflect on its role in gentrification and so contribute to the anti-gentrification process via financial and personnel investment.”
