“Offensive”: University honored Ron Burgundy, yet denounces “anchorman” term

Who would’ve thought that a university that renamed its communication school after the comedic and fictitious anchorman Ron Burgundy would end up banning the word “anchorman” from being said on campus?

According to Campus Reform, Emerson College put out an editorial style guide, known officially as the “Guidelines for Inclusive Language,” forbidding the use of words that threaten gender inclusivity.

Part of the guidelines read as follows:

Community members should avoid using language that is insensitive to cultural differences or that excludes or offends any group of people (based on their ability/disability, age, ethnicity and race, gender, gender identity and sexual orientation, etc.). Ask yourself whether it is appropriate to your communication to share a particular fact about a person (pertaining to social identity, e.g., age, ethnicity). In some circumstances, a person’s or group’s social identity will be irrelevant to what you are communicating, while in other circumstances it will be a very important part of the context.

In 2013, Emerson briefly named its communication school the “Ron Burgundy School of Communication” to celebrate a visit by actor Will Ferrell, who portrayed the mustachioed news anchor in the films Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy and its sequel Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues….

Now, Emerson is advising students to replace “anchorman” or any other “man” construction with gender neutral alternatives.

Anchor not anchorman

Artificial not manmade

Business executive not businessman

Camera operator not cameraman

Chair not chairman

Guard or staff not man (v.)

Humanity not mankind

Layperson not layman

Police officer not policeman

Spokesperson not spokesman

Workforce not manpower

I’m surprised they left out “Lady not woman.”

And while it’s nice to want to include people of all genders, Emerson’s policing of language runs contrary to its mission statement to “explore and push the boundaries of communication, art, and culture and, thereby, to contribute to the advancement of society.”

What’s the point of pushing boundaries if you’re constraining your students in what words they use and ideas they possess?

Related Content