Not so libertarian: Gary Johnson’s big problem with religious liberty

Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson has grown in popularity, but he may be losing some libertarian and conservative voters as they hear his position on religious liberty. Johnson spoke to Tim Carney of The Washington Examiner at the Democratic National Convention.

Carney asked Johnson about a New Mexico photographer who was punished for not servicing a gay wedding. Johnson hardly answered the question:

Look. Here’s the issue. You’ve narrowly defined this. But if we allow for discrimination — if we pass a law that allows for discrimination on the basis of religion — literally, we’re gonna open up a can of worms when it come stop discrimination of all forms, starting with Muslims … who knows. You’re narrowly looking at a situation where if you broaden that, I just tell you — on the basis of religious freedom, being able to discriminate — something that is currently not allowed — discrimination will exist in places we never dreamed of.

He continued to emphasize an unspecified plight of Muslims in subsequent answers about RFRA.

For all of his desire to get the federal government out of many areas, including education, Johnson believes it is the role of the federal government to prevent discrimination “in all cases.” Part of his answer involved the slippery slope argument employed by many others:

…I mean under the guise of religious freedom, anybody can do anything. Back to Mormonism. Why shouldn’t somebody be able to shoot somebody else because their freedom of religion says that God has spoken to them and that they can shoot somebody dead.

It’s not merely that Johnson hardly answered the questions with his confusing non-answer. Politicians frequently get into the habit. It’s not that he is ignorant about the issue. His responses won’t endear him to socially conservatives looking for a third party alternative, especially when he sounds like someone from the left.

Johnson acknowledged this when asked by Carney if he’s worried about “turning off conservatives who might come to the Libertarian Party” with original emphasis:

It’s the right message, and I’m sideways with the Libertarian Party on this. My crystal ball is that you are going to get discriminated against by somebody because it’s against their religion. Somehow you have offended their religion because you’ve walked in and you’re denied service. You.

Johnson might not care about attracting social conservatives, as shown through another non-answer. But, as a libertarian, he should know a thing or two more about the “liberty” aspect of religious liberty.

Related Content