Mainstream vs. social media: A tale of two wildly different DNC conventions

Published July 29, 2016 3:31pm ET



The mainstream media were ecstatic after watching the fourth and final day of the Democratic National Convention, praising Hillary Clinton and the long list of speakers for delivering a patriotic, unifying, and positive speech that had the audience with her on Thursday.

Social media, however, showed a different convention: divided and angry, where hundreds of Democrats booed and protested the acceptance speech of their party’s nominee.

Pro-Bernie supporters showed up with bright neon-yellow shirts, flashlights, and signs reading “WikiLeaks,” “emails,” “Jill Stein,” and blacked-out letters in Hillary posters so they read “liar.”

California and Washington state delegates were so upset during the speech that they walked out.

Outside the Wells Fargo Center wasn’t any calmer as hundreds of protestors chanted “Thank you WikiLeaks, Hillary cheats.”

The division and protests were mostly ignored by the mainstream media. Pundits and anchors agreed that 90 percent or more of Bernie voters would end up supporting Clinton. These protestors were a fraction of a fraction, though for some odd reason, a lot of them were delegates.

Democratic staffers worked overtime to make the convention seem different than previous days as delegates were given American flags to counter previous days when they waved Palestinian ones.

The mainstream media ate up all the smoke and mirrors. Their message was that the GOP was dark, Donald Trump was dangerous, Democrats are united, and Hillary has the experience.

Social media showed a much different world away from the balloon drop and fog machine. Perhaps that’s why millennials are so hesitant to fall in line behind Hillary: they aren’t being fed the mainstream media’s DNC-approved message.