Conservatives were right about Obama during the election

Published December 20, 2012 8:02pm ET



During the 2012 election, conservatives warned if President Obama were reelected taxes would rise, spending would increase, and it would be impossible to pass genuine entitlement reform. They were right. But now that the election is over, a number of conservatives are arguing that if only House Republicans hold firm, they can force Obama to cave and give them what they want.

Hugh Hewitt is urging Republicans to go over the “fiscal cliff” to negotiate a better deal in the new year. Earlier this month, Marc Thiessen argued that if Republicans stand their ground, they will eventually be able to enact real tax and entitlement reform. Maybe they should get Obama to appoint Federalist Society-style judges while they’re at it.

In seriousness, if all it takes to enact a conservative agenda is to hold one chamber of Congress, then why did conservative activists work so hard for Republicans to win control of the Senate? Why did they spill so much sweat in an effort to defeat Obama, even though it meant supporting Mitt Romney?

It’s important to draw a distinction between what legitimately can be seen as a GOP cave and what Republicans can realistically be expected to accomplish in an Obama second term by holding firm. Generally speaking, Republicans have the power to reduce the amount of bad stuff that can happen, but lack the ability make good stuff happen. In other words, they can block another major new entitlement from being passed, they can prevent the passage of pro-union/anti-worker “card check” legislation, they can withstand a push for intrusive gun control measures, and so on. But they aren’t going to pass pro-growth tax reform or fundamental entitlement reform, or force serious spending cuts. Obama and Harry Reid will never let that happen.

Read more at The Washington Examiner