Obama suggested that voting should be mandatory. Now he’s being called ‘totalitarian.’

Published March 20, 2015 2:33pm ET



President Obama is taking some heat for suggesting this week that mandatory voting might not be such a bad idea.

Speaking in Cleveland Wednesday, Obama pointed to foreign countries that have such a requirement as a potential solution to offset the increasing influence of money in politics.

“In Australia and some other countries, there’s mandatory voting. It would be transformative if everybody voted,” he said. “That would counteract money more than anything. If everybody voted, then it would completely change the political map in this country. Because the people who tend not to vote are young, they’re lower-income, they’re skewed more heavily to minority groups and immigrant groups. And they’re often the folks who are scratching and climbing to get into the middle class, and they’re working hard. There’s a reason why some folks try to keep them away from the polls. We should want to get them into the polls. So that may end up being a better strategy in the short-term.”

The remark didn’t draw any applause from the audience. It certainly didn’t from some in the punditocracy, either.

“This is, forgive me, a totalitarian impulse — that he would march people into the voting booth,” Judge Andrew Napolitano, a prominent libertarian, said Thursday.

“Here’s the point [Obama] refuses to point out or that he misses: Not voting is also a legitimate choice that some people make,” Sen. Marco Rubio weighed in. “I wish more people would participate in politics, too, but that is their choice. That is the choice of living in a free society.”

And the questioning was wide and deep.

The White House tried to clarify the president’s remarks Thursday, saying it wasn’t a “specific policy prescription.”

What was concrete was the president’s long-term solution: “I think it would be fun to have a constitutional amendment process about how our financial system works.”

cu3AZ1Hjw0c