Tag: Supreme Court

"Now if we had Scalia was living or Scalia was replaced by me, we wouldn't have had that," Trump said of the Court's decision. "It would have been the opposite." (Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg, File)

Trump says his Supreme Court pick would have changed abortion ruling

Ryan Lovelace · June 30, 2016 7:12 pm

Why the Supreme Court’s ruling could be worse for pro-lifers than you think

W. James Antle III · June 30, 2016 4:01 am

The abortion lobby has long benefitted from its use of the anodyne label "pro-choice." (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

‘Pro-choice’ army continues its offensive in the culture war

Timothy P. Carney · June 28, 2016 7:37 pm

The Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs in the Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association case a rehearing. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Supreme Court denies rehearing to major union case

Sean Higgins · June 28, 2016 7:06 pm

According to U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves, the exemptions on religious grounds granted by the state's recently signed House Bill 1523 violates the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 decision in the Obergefell case, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. (iStock photo)

Federal judge: Religion can’t block same-sex marriage license

Kelly Cohen · June 28, 2016 7:02 pm

The Supreme Court’s Hypocrisy on Abortion and Free Expression

Mark Hemingway · June 28, 2016 5:25 pm

Breyer Uses Anti-Gun Control Logic in Abortion Opinion

Chris Deaton · June 28, 2016 4:09 pm

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., left, meets Supreme Court nominee Judge Merrick Garland in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, March 17, 2016. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Washington Secrets

Battleground voters trust Obama, not Trump, to pick next justice

Paul Bedard · June 28, 2016 3:48 pm

The Supreme Court declined to consider new abortion doctor regulations in Mississippi and Wisconsin. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

Supreme Court declines to consider Mississippi, Wisconsin abortion regs

Paige Winfield Cunningham · June 28, 2016 2:28 pm

In a broad 5-3 ruling Monday that stunned and deflated abortion opponents, the justices wiped out years of work by groups who carefully crafted abortion provider regulations, prompted dozens of Republican-led states to pass them and then watched their strategy blossom as dozens of clinics shuttered around the country. (Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

Pro-lifers regroup after SCOTUS abortion decision

Paige Winfield Cunningham · June 28, 2016 4:01 am

By significantly weakening or eliminating these requirements with its ruling in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, a five-justice majority of the Supreme Court effectively declared on Monday that abortionists are not really healthcare providers, but some other, more special, even sacred species. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

Justices play the regulatory power game

Washington Examiner · June 28, 2016 4:01 am

MSNBC lets Wendy Davis take abortion victory lap

Becket Adams · June 28, 2016 2:19 am