A whole 90 days of anxiety have passed since California Gov. Gavin Newsom issued the nation’s first statewide stay-at-home order. Believing that lives saved would outweigh lives disrupted, 42 states made the same gamble. After all, lives are worth more than livelihoods, and it was important to flatten the COVID-19 curve. People understood that the moment required tough trade-offs and accepted them, some more readily than others.
Tens of millions of jobless claims later, what has surprised so many people is how politicians seem determined to make the gamble’s costs higher than necessary, as if economic cruelty would make lives easier to save. Ordering utilities to be turned off for “non-essential” businesses and arresting stylists for cutting hair so they can feed their children are examples of actions taken in the name of saving lives. Those actions neglect that on the other end of every paycheck are lives and livelihoods.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
