Op-Eds

Arms control and those Obamacare contraception mandates

By Matt Bowman
Published February 12, 2014 5:00am ET
Add Washington Examiner on Google
Arms control and those Obamacare contraception mandates
n the government's Supreme Court brief filed Monday against the Hahns, who operate Conestoga Wood Specialties, and in briefs and editorials by outside parties, we hear that religious freedom cannot be tolerated if it causes "third-party harm." (AP Photo) | Charles Dharapak

If I demand your wallet, and you say no, have you injured me?

That theory of “harm” is the basic argument supporting Obamacare’s abortion-pill mandate against the Hahns and the Greens, Christian families who object to providing abortion pills in their businesses’ health plans.

Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.

Tag:

Abortion Affordable Care Act Contraception Supreme Court