Horowitz admits he couldn’t get answers to crucial questions, so why did he draw such sweeping conclusions?

Published December 11, 2019 6:05pm ET



Michael Horowitz admitted over and over during a Senate hearing on Wednesday that he didn’t know the answers to the most important questions regarding his investigation of the FBI’s spying on President Trump’s 2016 campaign.

Why, then, was he so confident in his conclusions that despite some issues here and there, everything there was above board?

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.