<mediadc-video-embed data-state="{"cms.site.owner":{"_ref":"00000161-3486-d333-a9e9-76c6fbf30000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b93390000"},"cms.content.publishDate":1666291465735,"cms.content.publishUser":{"_ref":"0000017c-98ff-dba3-adfd-dffff9c60000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b933a0007"},"cms.content.updateDate":1666291465735,"cms.content.updateUser":{"_ref":"0000017c-98ff-dba3-adfd-dffff9c60000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b933a0007"},"rawHtml":"
var _bp = _bp||[]; _bp.push({ "div": "Brid_66201340", "obj": {"id":"27789","width":"16","height":"9","video":"1121159"} }); rn","_id":"00000183-f6b5-d2c9-a9e3-f6bdfb010000","_type":"2f5a8339-a89a-3738-9cd2-3ddf0c8da574"}”>Video Embed
While plenty of presidential administrations have run afoul of the Hatch Act, the Biden White House may be the first to run the risk of citing it too much.
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Already a member? Log in
