The prison labor loophole nobody wants to close

Published June 17, 2026 10:00am ET



The 13th Amendment abolished slavery. Most Americans know that. Fewer know the rest of that sentence: “except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.” That clause has governed American prison labor for 160 years, and neither party will debate it honestly. The reasons are straightforward, and neither is constitutional.

Republicans won’t touch it because the exception sits inside a tough-on-crime framework. Democrats won’t touch it because their union coalition has a direct financial interest in keeping prison labor off the competitive market. The AFL-CIO has opposed prison labor expansion for decades, not on moral grounds but on wage grounds. When labor costs drop to $0.03 an hour in Louisiana or zero in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, and Texas, prison workers compete directly with union shops. Both parties have institutional reasons for their silence. Neither has a constitutional one.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.