David Brooks is dead wrong: There is no difference between economic and traditional conservatism

Published September 25, 2012 4:00am ET



David Brooks thinks he has diagnosed the problem with Mitt Romney’s “underperforming campaign.” The culprit is not Romney’s late conversion to conservatism, Brooks writes in his column today, its that entire conservative movement has lost its “balance” between “economic” conservatives on the one hand, and “traditional” conservatives on the other.

According to Brooks, economic conservatives, “upheld freedom as their highest political value. They admired risk-takers. They worried that excessive government would create a sclerotic nation with a dependent populace.”

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.