?Radical? fingerprint decision challenged

Published



Calling a judge?s decision to eliminate fingerprint evidence in a death penalty case “stunning and radical,” Baltimore County?s top prosecutor contested the ruling Monday.

“This [judge] stands alone in American jurisprudence in ruling that fingerprint identification evidence is not reliable enough to be admitted,” Baltimore County State?s Attorney Scott Shellenberger wrote in a motion for reconsideration.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.