Nute Gunray
The upcoming 30th anniversary of Star Wars is generating all sorts of coverage. Variety has a full slate of stories on it, the History Channel has put together a feature-length project titled Star Wars: The Legacy Revealed, featuring interviews with Dan Rather, Newt Gingrich, and Nancy Pelosi. And now our friends at MEMRI report that Iranian television is getting in on the act, too. MEMRI notes that on March 22, Iran’s Channel 3 aired a commentary on the final installment of George Lucas’s prequels, Episode III: Revenge of the Sith. Here’s the transcript:
That’s an interesting interpretation. The conventional analogizing has always supposed that the Imperial forces in Star Wars were modeled on an amalgam of ancient Rome and Nazi Germany. Some dorkofascists have argued that the “Evil Empire” was actually the force for good when viewed objectively in the broad sweep of all six films. And some noted that the early prequels contained ham-handed swipes at modern Republicans (one minor baddie is clumsily named “Nute Gunray”). But I’ve never seen anyone suggest that Sith is an attack on the Bush Doctrine. The Iranian commentator’s “Lord Sith” (one assumes this refers to Senator Palpatine) quote–“We must bring democracy to every part of the world, and we must never allow the world to turn back on democracy.”–does sound an awful lot like something President Bush might say. Except that nowhere in the film does Palpatine say any such thing. (The closest anyone comes to this misquotation is Bail Organa, one of the early rebels, who exclaims, as Palpatine assumes imperial powers, that “We can’t let a thousand years of democracy disappear without a fight.”) In fact, very much counter to President Bush, Senator Palpatine distrusts the efficacy of democracy because the Galactic Republic has grown so large as to be ungovernable. And while Palpatine has other motives, by the evidence, his analysis of the Republic is at least close to the truth. Democracy is never shown to function well in the Star Wars universe and many of the epic’s heroes–Bail Organa, Princess Amidala, Princess Leia–are royals, not democratic leaders. But that doesn’t mean that the Iranian commentary is totally without foundation. When Revenge of the Sith was released, some of those involved in the production claimed that the movie was an attack on President Bush himself. Lucas explained that, “As you go through history, I didn’t think it was going to get quite this close. So it’s just one of those recurring things. I hope this doesn’t come true in our country.” Hayden Christensen, when asked if Sith “takes metaphoric shots at the war-mongering politics of U.S. presidents Richard Nixon and the two George Bushes” replied “Absolutely.” As Jeanette Walls reported at the time, “[Christensen] went on to say that he thinks that some people who weren’t American allies in the Iraq war will love “Revenge of the Sith” because of it.” It’s interesting that the makers of Sith saw their film as an attack on President Bush, while the Iranians see it as an attack on America and the Bush Doctrine. Perhaps in Tehran and Marin County this is a distinction without a difference. In any event, Lucas’s movie seems to have found a happy audience in Iran. One wonders if that gives him any pause.
