The degraded nature of public discussion these days surely owes much to people feeling as if they aren’t being heard when they try to speak up respectfully. Last week, though, I saw one small reason to believe respectful discourse can still be achieved.

Rarely have I received such a vitriolic response to anything I’ve written than I did to my column last week arguing that, legal guilt or innocence aside, Kenosha, Wisconsin, shooter Kyle Rittenhouse bears a large degree of moral responsibility for the deaths of two people he shot. Obscenities came in via almost every venue of social media, along with one direct threat and a challenge to a fight from a hotheaded congressional candidate obviously looking for attention.

Recommended Stories

Officers delete footage taken of jurors in Kyle Rittenhouse trial

Want to prevent future cases like Kyle Rittenhouse’s? Stop tolerating riots

Judge orders Kyle Rittenhouse rifle and magazine to be destroyed