<mediadc-video-embed data-state="{"cms.site.owner":{"_ref":"00000161-3486-d333-a9e9-76c6fbf30000","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b93390000"},"cms.content.publishDate":1654012147925,"cms.content.publishUser":{"_ref":"00000174-20cd-dd98-a5fd-64dfb14c0003","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b933a0007"},"cms.content.updateDate":1654012147925,"cms.content.updateUser":{"_ref":"00000174-20cd-dd98-a5fd-64dfb14c0003","_type":"00000161-3461-dd66-ab67-fd6b933a0007"},"rawHtml":"

var _bp = _bp||[]; _bp.push({ "div": "Brid_54011992", "obj": {"id":"27789","width":"16","height":"9","video":"1020774"} }); ","_id":"00000181-1ace-d297-a5e3-1fcf5d890000","_type":"2f5a8339-a89a-3738-9cd2-3ddf0c8da574"}”>Video EmbedLurking behind the mountains of prosecutorial evidence presented in over 150 exhibits and testimony by nearly two dozen witnesses in the now-concluded Michael Sussmann trial, questions swirl about how widely the debunked Trump-Russia collusion computer data spread among Washington, D.C.’s most powerful committees, including the Senate Armed Services Committee in early 2017.