CNN slammed for ‘wildly distorted’ article on Clarence Thomas’s election case dissent

Published



CNN legal analyst Joan Biskupic was slammed for a “wildly distorted” article regarding Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent on an election case.

“I’m amazed to see that Thomas’s dissent somehow generated this wildly distorted article from CNN’s veteran Supreme Court reporter Joan Biskupic,” distinguished senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center Ed Whelan wrote in a piece for National Review.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.