According to a lawsuit filed by the National Museum of Americans in Wartime, the Cecil and Irene Hylton Foundation has reneged on a pledged donation of 67 acres in Prince William County, Virginia, that was to be the home site for the long-proposed museum project honoring U.S. veterans.
Museum attorneys also claim the foundation used the pledge to gain otherwise unavailable upzoning for 11 Hylton family parcels in nearby Dale City that vastly increased the value of Hylton family properties in the county.
Recommended Stories
“The Foundation made an unconditional pledge, a contract, to support the relocation of an existing Prince William County museum. The Foundation was compensated handsomely by the County for that unconditional pledge. They have broken trust with the museum, the County, and, worst of all, with America’s veterans and their families,” Sheppard Mullin attorney Benjamin Chew said to the nonprofit organization.
FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, OFFICIALS WILL TESTIFY BEFORE CONGRESS ON ‘MORTIFYING’ SANCTUARY POLICIES
The museum’s board planned to recreate battle sites, such as World War I trenches and a battle-ravaged French village, to ensure that the true stories of the United States’s veterans and their homefront supporters would be told in ways accessible to all generations.
The museum owns many operating tanks and other military vehicles, including a 1942 Ford-manufactured jeep, a Stuart M5A1 tank, and a 1917 tank from WWI.
Men and women who served, their families back home, and those who supported them on the home front have shared wartime stories of loyalty, integrity, courage, leadership, honor, duty, and sacrifice. The museum has also collected over 900 personal oral history videos from veterans of every major U.S. conflict from World War II to the present.
The museum had additionally secured sizable commitments from the Commonwealth of Virginia and Prince William County to build its war chest, up to $22 million in government and philanthropic support from over 20,000 individual donors.
Yet their contributions — and their stories — remain in limbo thanks to the actions of the Hylton Foundation.
In 2012, then-CEO Donnie Hylton III had publicly and unconditionally pledged two Hylton Foundation parcels of land in Dale City, Virginia, along the busy Interstate 95 corridor, to the museum project. Hylton was an avid collector of automobiles and motorcycles, but he died in 2017 at 54.
Is it possible that the land donation was not altruistic but a “strategic arrangement driven by self-interest” that significantly increased the Hyltons’ wealth and reputation?
According to a lawsuit filed by the museum, the Hylton Foundation began shifting the terms of its original “unconditional” pledge, introducing unexpected milestone requirements and new conditions seemingly designed to quash the entire agreement.
The complaint states that the changing pledge structure and land-transfer terms have halted construction plans, made it harder for the museum to secure funding, and jeopardized key government and institutional partnerships in the process.
Moreover, in a December 2020 confirmation letter to the museum and its auditors, Conrad Hylton had stated the foundation had not only made the pledge of the land and commitment to fund “pad ready” site preparations but also agreed that the pledges had no restrictions or conditions.
There is even a publicly available video that validates the museum’s claims.
The museum’s lawsuit nonetheless charges the Hylton Foundation and Land LLC with breach of contract and unjust enrichment, asserting that the “unconditional” October 2012 Hylton Foundation pledge constituted a valid and binding contract under Virginia law. The museum has suffered damages, including the loss of the property, loss of governmental and donor support, wasted resources, and injury to its reputation.
The second charge asserts that the initial land donation agreement was, for the Hylton empire, a “strategic arrangement driven by self-interest.”
While the museum was publicly conducting annual open houses, fundraising, site plan work, governmental engagement, and initiatives such as the Voices of Freedom oral history project, it was around that time that the Conrad-led Hylton Foundation began disparaging the museum.
And then, in early 2025, the Hylton Foundation terminated all negotiations with the museum and demanded the transfer of all site plan rights and engineering work to Land LLC without compensation, asserting sole ownership and control of the property.
In short, the Hylton Foundation’s actions have left the museum without a home.
Questions linger: Is the Hylton enterprise attempting to privately develop land that it has already promised to this veterans-focused museum?
FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOLS RETAIN COPIOUS CULTURAL OBSERVANCE DAYS OUT OF ‘DIVERSITY’ CONCERNS
How odd is it that a museum seeking to honor the blood, sweat, toil, and tears of America’s veterans is having to fight its own battle against a powerful, entrenched former ally?
And is this battle really one between those who wish to honor America’s veterans against those who (in today’s polarized climate) want to bury that history?
Duggan Flanakin is a policy analyst at the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow.
