Did Obergefell produce the benefits that advocates predicted?

Published June 25, 2026 11:00am ET



Some arguments that led to the redefinition of marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 seemed to be common-sense, practical arguments. Supporters argued that legal recognition of marriage by same-sex couples would provide greater stability for same-sex couples, encourage marriage over cohabitation, and improve the well-being of sexual minorities. Many Americans found those arguments persuasive, even some of those who had reservations hoped that granting marriage licenses to same-sex couples would strengthen relationships and improve lives.

But now, 11 years later, we are no longer limited to predictions. We now have data. And the results raise an uncomfortable question: Did same-sex marriage achieve the outcomes its supporters promised?

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.