One leader was a confirmed interventionist. The other held that multiple treaties and binding arbitration were the surest path to world peace.
These divergent views on foreign affairs — and other issues as well — split the Right in 1912 and landed the “progressive” Woodrow Wilson in the White House. Will that same scenario play out in 2016?
Stay informed.Stay ahead.
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
See Options
Already a member? Log in
Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.
