Subscribe
Columnists

The ‘but judges!’ argument for Trump, and why it fails

By Timothy P. Carney
Published
Add Washington Examiner on Google
The ‘but judges!’ argument for Trump, and why it fails

“But, judges!”

This is just about the only argument conservatives can make these days when trying to convince other conservatives to vote for a pro-choice, thrice-married, serial-philandering, Clinton-donating, factually challenged, eminent-domain abusing, pro-corporate welfare, crony capitalist con-man Donald Trump.

Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account
Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.

Tag:

2016 Elections Commentary Conservatives Donald Trump Law Minusextra Republican Party Supreme Court Timothy P. Carney