Artificial intelligence is no substitute for troops on the ground

Published November 27, 2018 5:00am ET



In recent years, it’s been hard to swing a stick without hitting an article on militarized artificial intelligence. Most of them take the form of either advocacy or alarmism, but both of these arguments distract from the reality that future wars will still be driven by human policies.

Despite the fact that most of this technology has yet to be invented, much less fielded, we can’t stop talking about how AI will change the way the world fights its wars, or usher in a robot Armageddon. While AI will certainly play an important role in future conflicts, there is risk associated with exaggerating the extent of that role. For one, overemphasizing the potential wonders of synthetic warriors runs the risk of convincing the next generation of real warriors that these machines will fight their battles for them — they won’t.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.