How the Oscars lost its mojo

Published March 6, 2025 11:35pm ET



In the era of peak Oscars, the movies commemorated were, at worst, honorably decent and, at best, the sort of sumptuously mounted, inoffensively impressive super-spectacles that the industry had good reason to be proud of: Lawrence of Arabia, Patton, Amadeus, The Last Emperor, The English Patient, and, inevitably but justifiably, Titanic. By the same token, the stars assembled to deliver statuettes into the hands of their fellow stars were worth oohing and aahing over. John Wayne announced The Deer Hunter as best picture in 1979; Jack Nicholson announced Unforgiven in 1993. 

But Wayne is dead, Nicholson has entered a state of deep retirement, and Harrison Ford begged off fulfilling his previously-announced duties as an award-presenter due to shingles — a largely inconsequential viral infection (knock on wood) but one indicative of its victim having attained a certain age. Stars of this ilk have been replaced by alleged stars who garner more attention for their intra-celeb litigation (e.g., Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni) than their movies, which all too often are ugly, arty, and dumb in a manner that would have astonished the likes of David O. Selznick and Louis B. Mayer. 

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.