National Academies must strike biased climate change group designed to influence federal judges

Published March 11, 2026 11:00am ET



The U.S. Supreme Court very recently granted certiorari in Suncor Energy v. Boulder on the question of whether federal law preempts Boulder’s state-law tort claims for alleged injuries from purported interstate/international greenhouse gas emissions. Before the court hears the case, however, let’s examine the outsize yet mostly unknown influence fomenting this litigation that the Environmental Law Institute, Climate Judiciary Project, and other similar organizations have upon both the Federal Judicial Center and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Imagine that the National Rifle Association, “America’s longest-standing civil rights organization,” wrote a chapter on Second Amendment rights in the FJC’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, which is supposed to be an objective, neutral reference for judges. Anti-Second Amendment and pro-gun control groups would freak out because the NRA has an obvious agenda: it advocates, files lawsuits, lobbies for legislation, and is proudly pro-Second Amendment.

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.