Campaign finance: Democrats would’ve banned the Federalist Papers

By Washington Examiner

Published March 22, 2017 4:01am ET

Add Washington Examiner on Google

Campaign finance: Democrats would’ve banned the Federalist Papers — Gorsuch acknowledged, of course, that the Federalist Papers do not specifically mention corporate campaign spending. He wisely declined to go much further than that, rather than, for example, hooting with derisive laughter. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais) | Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Citizens United has become the new Roe v. Wade, or so it seemed on Tuesday.

President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, was peppered in the second day of hearings with questions about that 2010 case which Democrats loathe. Senators in the minority are annoyed that there’s too much freedom to spend money to unseat them, reasoning perhaps that otherwise, they’d still hold a majority.

Print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Digital subscriber? Click here to login/register your account.

Full midterm coverage.Deeper analysis.

Get unlimited access to Washington Examiner's reporting, expert analysis, and coverage of the midterm elections.

Get Unlimited Access

Cancel anytime.

Tag:

Campaign Finance Citizens United Commentary Editorials Minusextra Neil Gorsuch Nominations Supreme Court Washington Examiner