SCOTUS Obamacare arguments end on Medicaid debate

Published March 28, 2012 4:00am ET



Justices on the U.S. Supreme Court wrapped up three days of health care oral arguments this afternoon with a discussion of whether the national health care law’s expansion of Medicaid was unconstitutional.

Paul Clement, arguing on behalf of 26 states led by Florida, made the case that the expansion of the joint federal/state Medicaid program was coercive to states. Under the health care law, Clement said, if states don’t go along with the expansion, they not only lose out on the new money, but risk forgoing the money that they already receive to implement the existing Medicaid program — a figure that totals $3.3 trillion over 10 years.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.