Yesterday I posted an item refuting a Politico headline suggesting that a Daily Caller story about the EPA’s global warming regulations was “not based in fact.” The Daily Caller has since published an editor’s note citing my post and asserting it “agreed with” their analysis.

While there is much in the original Daily Caller story I do agree with, some of it, I think, does misread EPA’s intentions. DC executive editor David Martosko wrote to The Washington Post‘s Greg Sargent defending the story: