A few more theories on Caps’ road woes

Published January 16, 2012 5:00am ET



The topic of the day at Kettler Iceplex on Monday was the Caps’ inability to win on the road. Why bring it up now? Well, they finish a four-game homestand against the New York Islanders on Tuesday and then immediately head to Montreal after the game. Won’t get to catch them for a few days. Plus, there’s a sense among the players that while they’re happy with the recent stretch of wins they’ve put together, it won’t mean a whole lot unless they can sustain it. I put together a story for our print edition and had some leftover quotes. Jeff Halpern, quoted in the print story, had a few things to add.

“I know we haven’t done well [on the road]. I don’t know what the exact numbers are,” Halpern said. “I don’t know if I’ve ever been on a team where we’re that good at home and so far from it on the road. There’s not an intimidation factor. I think there was in years past where you went into buildings and it was scary going into Philly or something like that. For whatever reason it’s gone on all year and it’s something that you try to address or you think you can address. But until you get results….”

He trailed off. But until you get the results all of this is just a mighty wind. Should help that the Caps get Montreal and Carolina later this week before going into Pittsburgh. But the Canadiens game is a second of a back-to-back and Carolina played better than Washington did on Sunday at Verizon Center. Hard to argue otherwise. So even with a victory over the Islanders – no given considering the last meeting at Nassau Coliseum – they need to find a way to grab points away home. With that in mind, I got together with Washington Times beat writer Steve Whyno and put together a few lists – the home points percentage, road points percentage and points differential for all 30 NHL teams. Obviously, Washington ranks high on one – 3rd at home – and low on the other – 26th on the road. Only Detroit has a greater differential than the Caps’ .386 percentage.

“Aside from how guys feel on the ice and whether they have that energy or that excitement, just to play more aggressive,” Halpern said when asked what could be done different. “Whether it’s on our forecheck up ice or if our “D” are joining the rush or pinching down the walls, a lot of times when we get down by a goal we start playing more aggressive. On the road it turns a little bit as far as that excitement level. But I don’t know. I just think coming out and every man on the team saying that they’re going to kind of be harder on the forecheck or be a little more quicker up ice and try to create that excitement on our own.”  

 

Home                

1. DET .880

2. STL .820

3. WAS .761

4. NYR .737

5. CHI  .731

6. BOS .688

7. CAL .667

8. SJ .652

9. VAN .650

10. NASH .646

11. MIN .643

12. FLA .636

13. TOR .636

14. WIN .630

15. DAL .614

16. PHI .611

17. NJ .605

18. TB .605

19. OTT .604

20. PIT .600

21. EDM .595

22. LA .558

23. COLO .542

24. BUF .540

25. PHX .525

26. CAR .500

27. MON .500

28. NYI .479

29. ANA .457

30. COL .386

 

Road

1. BOS .722

2. PHI .680

3. NYR .667

4. SJ .658

5. VAN .635

6. LA .600

7. NASH .595

8. OTT .587

9. NJ .580

10. CHI .550

11. PIT .542

12. PHX .538

13. FLA .523

14. COLOR .522

15. DAL .500

16. MIN .500

17. TOR .477

18. STL .475

19. DET .458

20. MON .432

21. WIN .409

22. BUF .400

23. NYI .395

24. ANA .381

25. CAL .380

26. WAS .375

27. CAR .318

28. TB .300

29. EDM .283

30. COL .273

 

Differential

1. DET .422

2. WAS .386

3. STL .345

4. EDM .312

5. TB .305

6. CAL .287

7. WIN .221

8. CAR .182

9. CHI .181

10. TOR .159

11. MIN .143

12. BUF .140

13. DAL .114

14. FLA .113

15. NYI .084

16. ANA .076

17. NYR .070

18. MON .068

19. PIT .058

20. NASH .051

21. NJ .025

22. COLO .020

23. OTT .017

24. VAN .015

25. COL .113

26. SJ -.006

27. PHX -.013

28. BOS -.034

29. LA -.042

30. PHI -.069

Follow me on Twitter @bmcnally14