New York’s socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani, promises to spend $22 billion over the next five years building 200,000 new “affordable” homes and “preserving” another 200,000. Time will tell if he meets that goal even as he sets higher minimum wages for construction workers. But an even larger transfer of wealth is embedded in the mayor’s new “Block by Block” housing plan, which will force many landlords to hand their property over to corrupt and unaccountable nonprofit organizations.
Speaking May 26 in Brooklyn, Mamdani recounted past efforts that secured “stronger rent stabilization laws” for tenants and “right to counsel” for people being evicted in housing court. Mamdani promised to investigate “every single” complaint made by tenants and to support tenant organizations. “If you form a tenant union, the city will stand with you,” Mamdani said. “We will deliver the accountability you deserve from your landlord by doing a roof-to-basement inspection of your building.”
Recommended Stories
Then he revealed what is really at the center of his plan. “Finally,” he said, “through our new citywide campaign, ‘Fix the City,’ we will focus on the worst landlords in New York City. When necessary, we will take aggressive legal action to remove negligent owners and property managers. And for buildings that have suffered chronic neglect, we will work to transfer ownership to responsible stewards. Stewards that include community land trust and nonprofits.”
Community organizers from the Democratic Socialists of America would have municipal muscle behind them to drive tenant complaints in selected buildings. No grievance or building would be too small. Each effort would turn into a public campaign built around demonstrations, rent strikes, and pressure on property owners. To paraphrase Saul Alinsky, targets would be chosen, frozen, and polarized.
Next, the city’s buildings department would be used to generate violations and fines, producing an official record to support intervention. Whether the problems are trivial or substantial would be beside the point. The accumulated count would be presented as evidence of failed management.
Between escalating penalties, coordinated rent strikes, and sustained activist pressure, landlords would find it difficult, not to mention costly, to defend themselves. At that point, Mamdani could turn to the city’s 7A Program to place the building under a court-appointed administrator with authority to collect rents and run the property. Once deprived of rental income and operational control, owners would be pushed toward selling.
The buildings would then move to nonprofit organizations — those benevolent-sounding organizations that are so often vehicles for extreme egalitarian activism, grift, and the rewards of government friends. This is central to the plan. Mamdani’s housing program would sharply increase the holdings, funding streams, and political clout of nonprofit housing organizations, making them a permanent landed class in New York politics for years to come.
Mamdani’s housing plan also earmarks billions of dollars in new spending for New York’s largest landlord, the New York City Housing Authority, which owns and operates over 150,000 units despite being under federal supervision for misconduct involving lead, mold, heating, pests, and broken elevators. In December, a third-party monitor found some incremental improvements in the Housing Authority’s management of properties, but it was still “substantially out of compliance” on most targets.
Being the socialist that he is, Mamdani assuredly believes that pouring more money into the Housing Authority will solve its problems. But it won’t. Neither will transferring more privately held property to nonprofit groups. New York’s housing problem was not caused by too little government intervention, but by too much of it.
TRUMP MAY ALREADY BE A LAME DUCK
Mamdani cited Austin, Texas, as a housing policy success story in his speech. He should study Austin’s example more closely, for it didn’t lower rents by creating a government-run housing company or harassing landlords until they turned over their property to nonprofit organizations. It lowered housing prices by removing regulations and letting the market meet demand by building more houses.
Mamdani dresses his agenda in the language of affordability, but it is really about confiscation. New York does not need more politicized ownership and nonprofit patronage. It needs more homes, fewer barriers to building them, and a housing market where supply, not government coercion, brings rents down.
